Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- ljwrites:research:unforgotten_sisters:start [2025/04/01 07:40] – Organized headers ljwrites
+++ ljwrites:research:unforgotten_sisters:start [2025/04/02 23:15] (current) – Minor edits, more on Cheomseongdae records ljwrites
@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 # Unforgotten Sisters investigation
-From an unfortunate need to investigate fictional or baseless claims about Queen Seondeok/Cheomseongdae being presented as fact in Gabriella Bernardi's The Unforgotten Sisters: Astronomers and Scientists before Caroline Herschel (2016 Springer Praxis)
+## Background
-## Cosmos Magazine article
+I became aware of the Cosmos Magazine article [The unforgotten sisters: Sonduk, the astronomer queen](https://cosmosmagazine.com/space/the-unforgotten-sisters-sonduk-the-astronomer-queen/) by Gabriella Bernardi (hereinafter "Cosmos Magazine article," archived version https://archive.is/j7d1n ) from somewhat implausible claims about the ancient Korean monarch Seondeok (善德王, styled 聖祖皇姑) being discussed as fact on social media.
+These include the claims that the female king was an astronomer herself as a princess, had a Tang ambassador named Lin Fang as a tutor, and predicted a solar eclipse as a teenager.
-[The unforgotten sisters: Sonduk, the astronomer queen](https://cosmosmagazine.com/space/the-unforgotten-sisters-sonduk-the-astronomer-queen/) Archived version https://archive.is/j7d1n
+I found out from reading the article that it was adapted from an earlier book by the same author, Gabriella Bernardi's *The Unforgotten Sisters: Astronomers and Scientists before Caroline Herschel* (2016 Springer Praxis, hereinafter "*Unforgotten Sisters*") and read the relevant chapter on Seondeok in the book.
+The chapter made similar implausible claims that I had not seen in any historical record or non-fictional discussions of historical records.
-  * Same problems as the book chapter on Seondeok in presenting details from Sheri Holman's novel Sondok: Princess of the Moon and Stars (2002 Scholastic) without credit to Holman or adequate notice of the fictional content
+To prevent the further spread of possible misinformation and to correct the record if necessary, I set out to discover the source of these assertions about Seondeok starting with the bibliography of *Unforgotten Sisters.*
+Suspicions about these claims and subsequent research were recorded contemporaneously on a [Mastodon thread](https://writeout.ink/@ljwrites/113164984973469900).
+This page and linked pages are a more formal documentation and expansion of the findings.
-## Fediverse thread
+## Dubious claims
-[Thread on writeout.ink](https://writeout.ink/@ljwrites/113164984973469900)
+The following are the claims in the Cosmos Magazine article and/or the Seondeok chapter of *Unforgotten Sisters* that I found dubious for not being found in recorded history:
-## Possible sources for the details on Seondeok
+  * Votive jar dedicated to grandmother
+  * Claimed birth year of 610 CE
+  * Peony seed anecdote dated to seven years of age
+  * A Chinese ambassador named Lin Fang serving as her tutor
+  * Astronomer princess
+  * Solar eclipse prediction
+  * Begged her father to build an observatory
+  * Method of observation from Cheomseongdae
+The problem with most of these claims are, at base, that they are not found in the known historical records from books such as the *Samguk Sagi* (三國史記, History of the Three Kingdoms) and *Samguk Yusa* (三國遺事, Stories from the Three Kingdoms).
+Some of the problems are elaborated in more detail below:
+### Claimed year of birth
+Seondeok's years of rule and death are in the known historical record (r. 632-647, d. 647), but her birth year is not.
+Yet the Cosmos Magazine article states that "She was born in 610 CE," while the Seondeok chapter of *Unforgotten Sisters* makes two conflicting claims in marking her birth year correctly in the title as unknown and then, just a few lines down near the beginning of the text, claiming her birth year as 610 AD.
+### Peony seed anecdote
+The Cosmos Magazine article states:
+> At seven, for example, a box of peony seeds arrived at the Court, from China. ... Her observation about the peonies’ lack of smell proved correct – one illustration among many of her intelligence.
+The anecdote itself is well-known and attested in both the *Samguk Sagi* and *Samguk Yusa,* but no record dates this specifically to when she was seven years of age as claimed by Bernardi.
+The *Samguk Sagi* states she made this prediction as a princess while her father was still king but does not pinpoint the age, while the *Samguk Yusa* states the episode took place during her own reign when she was likely much older than seven.
+### The construction of Cheomseongdae
+The Cosmos Magazine article claims the following about the background for the construction of Cheomseongdae:
+> Sonduk had begged her father for several years to set out on its building, but eventually accomplished the challenge on her own.
+As far as I know, however, no historical record on Cheomseongdae goes into this level of detail about the background of its construction. The first record on Cheomseongdae is the following line in the *Samguk Yusa:*
+> 別記云是王代鍊石築瞻星臺 (A separate record states that it was in this King[ Seondeok]'s time that stone was shaped to build Cheomseongdae.)
+- 三國遺事 記異卷第一 善德王知幾三事 (Stories from the Three Kingdoms, Extraordinary Events Book 1, Three Episodes of King Seondeok's Foreknowledge) [Hangul translation](https://db.history.go.kr/ancient/level.do?levelId=sy_001r_0020_0330_0010) / [Scan of original record](https://db.history.go.kr/common/imageViewer.do?levelId=sy_001r_0020_0010_0010)
+Later records do not go into much more detail than the year of construction, either.
+There is some disagreement between records on when it was built, but they generally agree it was during Seondeok's time.
+### The method of observation from Cheomseongdae
+The Cosmos Magazine article states:
+> According to the historical accounts, when astronomers were observing in Sonduk’s tower, they laid on their back and watched the celestial objects through four domes on the top, arranged in a square and oriented towards the four cardinal points.
+This would be remarkable if true because there is no such historical account to my knowledge, and to the knowledge of many scholars over the centuries who have speculated on how the Cheomseongdae was used for observation.
+In fact there is dispute in the Korean historical and archaeological communities over whether the building was used for astronomical observation at all, though I do not expect most outside a very specific niche of expertise to know about this controversy.
+If Bernardi can present a historical record in support of her assertion, of course, it would be a remarkable find.
+However, I personally could find no such record myself and could not trace it to any of her cited sources I could access.
+## Sources tracked
 ### Women of Korea
-  * Yung-Chung Kim, Women of Korea: A History from Ancient Times to 1945 2nd ed. (1977)
+  * Yung-Chung Kim, Women of Korea: A History from Ancient Times to 1945 (2nd ed. 1977)
-    * Index of Queen Sonduk references: 23, 24, 27, 42 (Apparent mistake for 25, 26, 27, 42)
-This book does not appear to have any mention of Seondeok's passion for astronomy, her having a Tang ambassador as a tutor, etc. See [[wok_transcript]].
+This book (hereinafter "*Women of Korea*") was cited in the bibliography of *Unforgotten Sisters* and I read the parts relevant to Seondeok as a possible source for the unusual claims made by Bernardi.
+However, *Women of Korea* does not go beyond the known historical information on Seondeok and I could not find any mention of details unique to *Unforgotten Sisters* such as her passion for astronomy or having a Tang ambassador as a tutor.
+See [[wok_transcript]] for the transcribed contents of this book pertaining to Seondeok.
 ### Sŏndŏk: Princess of the Moon and Stars
@@ Line 26: / Line 84: @@
   * Sheri Holman, Sŏndŏk: Princess of the Moon and Stars (2002)
-This middle-grade novel has many striking similarities with the assertions about Seondeok that I could not trace to any non-fiction source.
+Not directly cited in *Unforgotten Sisters* or the Cosmos Magazine article and found by independent search, this middle-grade novel (hereinafter "*Princess of the Moon and Stars*") has many striking similarities with the assertions about Seondeok that I could not trace to any historical source.
 There are even passages with very similar wording.
 See [[poms_comparison]].
+Interestingly, Bernardi's assertion that an astronomer using Cheomseongdae laid on their back and watched the heavens through four domes is one of the few dubious claims that cannot be traced to Holman's *Princess of the Moon and Stars,* with Holman stating in the epilogue:
+> It is almost certain that a wooden platform made the tower even higher, but modern scientists are not absolutely sure as to how the tower was used. It is shrouded in mystery. (p. 161)
+I am unsure about the strength of the wooden platform hypothesis, but at any rate this directly contradicts Bernardi's account.
+Furthermore, the acknowledgement of uncertainty over the specific mode of Cheomseongdae's usage is a much better-supported statement than a claim of historical records documenting a specific method, because no such record exists to the best of my knowledge.
+### Other sources
+I looked through four other sources in the *Unforgotten Sisters* bibliography that might be relevant to Seondeok and that I had library access to, mostly biographical dictionaries of astronomers and scientists.
+I could not find any mention of her in these books, however.
+I also looked through all the working links in the Web section of the bibliography and could not find Seondeok mentioned in any of them, either.
+## Tentative conclusions
+  * Almost all the dubious claims about Seondeok not found in the recorded history appear to be drawn uncited and uncredited from the novel *Princess of the Moon and Stars.* Other assertions with unclear factual support need either better sourcing or retraction.
+  * The Seondeok chapter in *Unforgotten Sisters* and the Cosmos Magazine article based on it should be retracted or corrected to remove the fictional material.
+  * If the chapter and article are left as they are, they should be marked or otherwise notified as largely fictional, and Ms. Holman's permission should be sought for the use, with appropriate credit, of fictional details she originated. She may also be due some form of apology, acknowledgement, and recompense.